Detection and Mapping of Slow-moving Landslides with Pleiades-1 Data

Main Article Content

Eyo E.,
Gbedu A.,
Faruna S.,
Bako M.
Adewale O.

Abstract

 The study utilised the k-NN and SVM algorithms, Pleiades-1 data, and object-based image analysis for the classification and mapping of slow-moving landslides in Kutlugün in Maçka district of Turkey. The approaches employed were based on the investigation of the influences of the training sample sizes and type (balanced/imbalanced) on the accuracy of the classification results. A total of 128 and 134 small landslides were detected using k-NN and SVM algorithms, respectively. The SVM method had higher producer accuracy (85.9%), user accuracy (89.4%) and kappa index (0.82) compared to the k-NN algorithm that had producer accuracy (83.1%), user accuracy (86.0%) and kappa index (0.80). Using the imbalanced datasets, the classification accuracy of SVM was not significantly different among the five different training sample sizes, with 83.75% for the lowest dataset (dat2) and 85.12% for the highest dataset (dat5). On the other hand, the classification accuracy of k-NN was significantly different between the smallest sample size (dat1, 79.80%) and the largest sample size (dat5, 84.59%). When balanced datasets were used, the SVM algorithm produced accuracy of 85.07% compared to k-NN classifier (84.10%), showing that there was no pronounced difference on the performance of the two classifiers on different training sample sizes. The overall evaluation of the two algorithms show that using supervised classification at object level with Pleiades-1 image, for slow-moving landslide detection and mapping, is possible and can be improved. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Detection and Mapping of Slow-moving Landslides with Pleiades-1 Data. (2026). Environmental Technology & Science Journal, 17(1), 217-225. https://journal.futminna.edu.ng/index.php/etsj/article/view/253
Section
Articles

How to Cite

Detection and Mapping of Slow-moving Landslides with Pleiades-1 Data. (2026). Environmental Technology & Science Journal, 17(1), 217-225. https://journal.futminna.edu.ng/index.php/etsj/article/view/253

References

Akbulut, Y., Sengur, A., Guo, Y. & Smarandache, F.

(2017). NS-k-NN: Neutrosophic Set-Based kNearest Neighbors classifier. Symmetry, 9, 1-10.

Archibald, R. & Fann, G. (2007). Feature selection and

classification of hyperspectral images with

support vector machines. IEEE Geoscience and

Remote Sensing Letters, 4, 674-677.

Ballabio, C. & Sterlacchini, S. (2012). Support vector

machines for landslide susceptibility mapping:

The Staffora River Basin case study, Italy. Math

Geosci., 44, 47-70.

Cheng, G., Guo, L., Zhao, T., Han, J., Li, H. & Fang, J.

(2013). Automatic landslide detection from

remote-sensing imagery using a scene

classification method based on BoVW and

pLSA. Int. J. Remote Sensing, 34, 45-59.

Colditz, R. R. (2015). An evaluation of different

training sample allocation schemes for discrete

and continuous land cover classification using

decision tree-based algorithms. Remote Sensing,

, 9655-9681.

Cruden, D. M. & Varnes, D. J. (1996). Landslide types

and processes. In: Turner, A.K., Schuster, R.L.

(eds.) Landslides, Investigation and Mitigation,

Special Report 247. Transportation Research

Board, Washington D.C., pp 36-75.

de Vries, M. V. W., Arrell, K., Basyal, G. K.,

Densmore, A. L., Dunant, A. L., Harvey, E. L.,

Jimee, G. K., Kincey, M. E., Li, S., Pujara, D.

S., Shrestha, R., Rosser, N. J. & Dadson, S. J.

(2024). Detection of slow-moving landslides

through automated monitoring of surface

deformation using Sentinel-2 satellite imagery.

Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 49(4),

-1410

Franco-Lopez, H., Ek, A. R. & Bauer, M. E. (2001).

Estimation and mapping of forest stand density,

volume and cover type using the k-Nearest

Neighbors method. Remote Sens. Environ., 77,

-274.

Fu, S., de Jong, S. M., Nijland, W., Gravey, M.,

Kraaijenbrink, P. & de Haas, T. (2025).

Retrieving 4D landslide displacement using

Pléiades satellite stereo pairs on the La Valette

landslide. International Journal of Applied

Earth Observation & Geoinformation, 140, 1-

Guzzetti, F., Mondini, A. C., Cardinali, M., Fiorucci,

F., Santangelo, M. & Chang, K.-T. (2012).

Landslide inventory maps: New tools for an old

problem. Earth Sci. Review, 112, 42-66.

He, H. & Garcia, E. A. (2009). Learning from

imbalanced data. IEEE Transactions on

Knowledge & Data Engineering, 21(9), 1263-

Heleno, S., Matias, M., Pina, P. & Sousa, A. J. (2016).

Semi-automated object-based classification of

rain-induced landslides with VHR multispectral

images on Madeira Island. Nat. Hazards Earth

Syst. Sci., 16, 1035-1048.

Hölbling, D., Füreder, P., Antolini, F., Cigna, F.,

Casagli, N. & Lang, S. (2012). A semiautomated object-based approach for landslide

detection validated by persistent scatterer

interferometry measures and landslide

inventories. Remote Sensing, 4 (5), 1310-1336.

Kavzoglu, T., Sahin, E. K. & Colkesen, I. (2015).

Selecting optimal conditioning factors in

shallow translational landslide susceptibility

mapping using genetic algorithm. Engineering

Geology, 192, 101-112.

Lee, S., Hong, S.-M. & Jung, H.-S. (2017) A Support

Vector Machine for landslide susceptibility

mapping in Gangwon Province, Korea.

Sustainability, 9(1), 1-15.

Li, Y., Chen, G., Wang, B., Zheng, L., Zhang, Y. &

Tang, C. (2013). A new approach of combining

aerial photography with satellite imagery for

landslide detection. Nat. Hazards, 66, 649-669.

Environmental Technology & Science Journal

Volume 17 Number 1 June 2026

Mountrakis, G., Im, J. & Ogole, C. (2011). Support

vector machines in remote sensing: A review.

ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote

Sensing, 66, 247-259.

Noi, P. T. & Kappas, M. (2018). Comparison of

Random Forest, k-Nearest Neighbor, and

Support Vector Machine classifiers for land

cover classification using Sentinel-2 imagery.

Sensors, 18, 1-20.

Novellino, A., Pennington, C., Leeming, K., Taylor, S.,

Alvarez, I. G., McAllister, E., Arnhardt, C. &

Winson, A. (2024). Mapping landslides from

space: A review. Landslides, 21, 1041-1051

Qian, Y., Zhou, W., Yan, J., Li, W. & Han, L. (2015).

Comparing machine learning classifiers for

object-based land cover classification using very

high resolution imagery. Remote Sensing, 7,

-168.

Rana, D., Dadkhah, H., Ghaderpour, E., Bozzano, F. &

Mazzanti, P. (2026). Monitoring slow-moving

landslides through PS-InSAR and antecedent

precipitation index: a case study of Petacciato,

Italy. International Journal of Remote Sensing,

(6), 2605-2634.

Sassa, K., Tsuchiya, S., Fukuoka, H., Mikos, M. &

Doan, L. (2015). Landslides: Review of

achievements in the second 5-year period

(2009–2013). Landslides, 12, 213-223.

Shao, Y. & Lunetta, R. S. (2012). Comparison of

support vector machine, neural network, and

CART algorithms for the land-cover

classification using limited training data points.

ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sensing, 70, 78-

Shi, D. & Yang, X. (2015). Support vector machines

for land cover mapping from remote sensor

imagery. In: Monitoring and Modeling of Global

Changes: A Geomatics Perspective. Springer:

Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 265-279.

Statnikov, A., Wang, L. & Aliferis, C. F. (2008). A

comprehensive comparison of random forests

and support vector machine for microarraybased cancer classification. BMC

Bioinformatics, 9, 1-10.

Stumpf, A. & Kerle, N. (2011). Object-oriented

mapping of landslides using random forests.

Remote Sensing of Environment, 115, 2564-

Vapnik, V. (1999). The nature of statistical learning

theory. Springer-Verlag

Yalçinkaya, M. & Bayrak, T. (2005). Comparison of

static, kinematic and dynamic geodetic

deformation models for Kutlugün landslide in

North-eastern Turkey. Natural Hazards, 34, 91-

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 > >>